Everything’s Coming Up Babies

May 18, 2008 by rcid

Spring blooms in the upstate–trees sprout new leaves, flowers poke their heads out of the earth, and the bellies of women in/related to the RCID program pop with little ones soon to make their first appearances. We celebrated this abundance on Saturday, May 17, 2008, throwing a four-way baby shower at the Vitanza’s house because, really, friends don’t let friends have babies without parties. In attendance, in full pregnant glory, were

> Xiaoli Li (Alex Kudera) > Wu Dan (Wang Pu) > Nicole Hodgson (Justin)

> Michele Morton was our fourth honoree, though her (and Keith’s) bloom had already come to fruition; Lola arrived on 22 April 2008. Here’s a pic of Michelle with Alayna and the new arrival Lola. Many of us stood in adoration of the adorable new one (and I got to hold her!), a lovely addition to the Morton’s older daughters, Juliana and Alayna. There’s not much room for Keith in this situation. But he’s in there somewhere! He has his hands full in a later picture below.

The new RCID kids will have plenty of young playmates, in addition to Juliana and Alayna–also in attendance at the party were Meredith Hilst, and Garret and Jonas Abboud (and their parents); and our new RCID families bring a few more additions to the kid-parade. There also could be some built-in babysitters in Sarah and Andrew Walwema and Roman Vitanza–but that may be a bit presumptuous.

Here’s some of the relatively new kids:

While the kids frolicked, grown-ups–numerous other RCID students, faculty, and guests–shared stories, food, and drink. In addition to baby-related conversations (from diapers to epidurals), we recounted our end of semester achievements, contemplated summer respites and travels, posited conceptual refigurings of the world, and maintained our witty repartee and quick pop culture references.

The evening ended with the distribution of a wealth of diapers (the gift of choice–though I’ve learned they’ll only cover about a week of baby bottoms–yikes!), and well-wishes for all. As the academic year has come to a close, we look forward to the fall and the continued expansion of RCID with our newbies–in so many ways!

Oh, Here’s a post-carte:

ps: Pix courtesy of Alicyn Butler and Justin Hodgson. The post-carte is of Justin’s making.

~ Amanda Booher ~

From Exams to Dissertations

May 17, 2008 by rcid

This Spring (2008), Justin and Amanda completed their exams and are moving on to their dissertations. The RCID exams include three written exams and an oral, multimedia presentation of the dissertation area and issue. Both Justin and Amanda will defend their dissertations in the Spring 2009.

Justin Hodgson’s dissertation title is “Logos of Possibilities: Rhetorical Inventions/Inventional Rhetorics” (Chair, Victor Vitanza)

Dissertation Primary Area: Rhetorical Invention

Secondary Area1: Electronic Discourse

Secondary Area2: Critical/Cultural Theories

Amanda K. Booher’s is “Composing the Prosthetic Body: Sampling and Remixing Constructions of Flesh and Technology” (Chair, Todd May)

Dissertation Primary Area: Composing the Body

Secondary Area1: Medical Rhetorics and Prosthetics

Secondary Area2: Constructing the Body

~Vj V~

The Future of the Dissertation

May 15, 2008 by rcid

Justin Hodgson, Ph.D. candidate, RCID, has been invited to participate in ~the Institute for the Future of the Book workshop~ on Sophie* at USCal, Los Angeles. Specifically he will be working with a group in the Institute for Multimedia Literacy (IML) in the School of Cinematic Arts. For four days, May 27-30. (He of course has accepted.) This is Bob Stein’s project that has been funded by the Macarthur Foundation and the Mellon Foundation. This group is one segment of the Consortium that the RCID program has been developing with others. It’s beginning to payoff already. Only two people in the country are invited to this workshop. There will be a followup workshop in August that Justin will attend again so that he can make a report.

Justin will be writing/developing his dissertation both in print literacy, to be submitted to the CU GS, and in electronic literacy (in Sophie), to demonstrate the differences between paper/pdf files and a multimedia dissertation that still meets all the required scholarly conventions of a “dissertation.” As far as we know, only Virginia Kuhn (University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee) and one other person have developed/”written” and produced their dissertations in a multimedia format. VK did hers in TK3, which was a forerunner of Sophie. She now teaches and conducts research at USCal in the IML.

*Sophie is a stand-alone media assemblage application that allows for every mode of media communications: pix, audio, video, etc. It is free and open source.

More news forthcoming. Stay tuned. Check the RCID program Blog. Also know that we are sending two RCID students (Amanda Booher and Joshua Abboud) to the European Graduate School in Saas Fee, Switzerland, where they will study with major film directors, Continental philosophers, media historians, etc. This connection, too, is part of our Consortium. We will have news from them when they return.

RCID Rocks! Bestest,
~Vj V~

KDM Digital, an Inaugural Event

April 19, 2008 by rcid

The RCID program with the support of the MATRF is happy to announce that the

> Knowing,

> Doing, and

> Making

> Digital Podcasting System . . .

IS UP & RUNNING. For short, it’s KDM Digital.

Mike Hovan composed the music and performed the opening narration on the podcasts. He also designed the logo for KDM Digital.

Michelle Dacus Carr is the Producer as well as Editor for KDM Digital.

KDM Digital can be found at www.clemson.edu/itunesu/index.html. (You will need iTunes.) When you arrive, there’s no reason to sign in, just click the appropriate Welcome button and enter. What you will find at present are four files:

The inaugural event of the conception of KDM Digital, which was part of a discussion among Tharon Howard (the Director of MATRF), Michelle Dacus Carr, Art Young, Cynthia Haynes, and Victor Vitanza. The historical file is there and ready for you to download and listen to.

Following this dicussion, VjV rebegins his infamously famous Re/Inter/Views (a neologism for interview and review) with two authors, separately and then together. Unlike the previous Re/Inter/Views, developed under the rubric the pre/text conversations, these are more tame and gentle in their exchanges. In fact, they are startups to grander, looser Involutionary events.

The first Re/Inter/View is with Byron Hawk (George Mason U) and his new book A Counter-History of Composition: Toward Methodologies of Complexity (Pitt Comp Literacy Culture), 2007.

The second is with Thomas Rickert (Purdue U) and his Acts of Enjoyment: Rhetoric, Zizek, and the Return of the Subject (Pitt Comp Literacy Culture), 2007.

Thereafter, there’s an open discussion between Byron and Thomas on the “next book.”

Both of these authors/books won the Best Book Awards, 2007, given by the journal JAC.

We are just beginning. There will be more Re/Inter/Views, both infamous & famous. In the near future, please be aware, we will also return to our online Re/Inter/Views, mostly so as to return to the infamous X-changes. Visit www.pre-text.com.

Best to you and your books!

~ Vj V

ps: Ah, KDM Digital has a fan, GVCarter, on YouTube.

The First of Many

April 13, 2008 by rcid

The Rhetorics, Communication, and Information Design Ph.D. program at Clemson University will award its first doctoral degree on May 9, 2008.

Mac McArthur successfully defended his dissertation entitled “Instructional Proxemics: Creating a place for space in instructional communication discourse” on Friday April 11, 2008, and was recommended for graduation by his committee. This degree will be the first Ph.D. awarded by the College of Architecture, Arts, and Humanities in the history of Clemson University, as well as the first for the innovative and transdisciplinary Rhetorics, Communication, and Information Design program (RCID).

Instructional Proxemics” blends the study of theories in

> instructional communication;

> space & proxemics; and

> information/user-experience design

to investigate the influence of space on the interactions of students and teachers as mutual learners.

The abstract of the dissertation:

Changes in strategies of teaching and learning, changes in students, and changes in technology have necessitated contemporary changes in spaces of learning. Grounded in the general model of instructional communication (McCroskey, Valencic, & Richmond, 2004), this study proposes Instructional Proxemics as a conceptual framework for assessing the instructional environment through a blending of instructional communication and information/user-experience design. In a field-experiment involving five instructors teaching 15 sections of Public Speaking, students (n = 234) were invited to respond to a survey assessing measures of student learning, teacher behaviors, classroom practices, and classroom perceptions.

Results of this study indicate that learning spaces influence student perceptions across these measures, and that these perceptions are mitigated by the instructor. Instructor journals are used to provide context for these results. In sum, this dissertation advances the general model of instructional communication by promoting Instructional Proxemics as an impetus for the study of contemporary and innovative spaces of learning.

In a message to the Clemson administration, Dr. Andy Billings, chair of this dissertation committee, wrote that this dissertation is “an excellent example of the type of work that can be produced at the doctoral level in this field.” Alongside Dr. Billings, Dr. Bryan Denham (Communication Studies), Dr. Bill Havice (College of Health, Education, and Human Development), and Dr. Sean Williams (English, Professional Communication) served as members of the dissertation committee.

The defense, held in the Class of 1941 Studio, was attended by more than 25 members of the RCID family who rallied to support their colleague on this momentous day for the program. This success is just the beginning of a bright future for the RCID community at Clemson.

~ This has been a press release by Mac McArthur himself:

Mac has just told us: “I have accepted a position at Queens University of Charlotte for the upcoming academic year. I am very excited to serve there as an Assistant Professor of Communication, working toward tenure.” Congratulations, Mac!

StRange @ Popular Culture Association

April 12, 2008 by rcid

Communication and Digital Culture VI:

~ ~ ~ We Are the Strange . . .

The object/s of post-criticism were M Dot Strange and the film We Are the Strange:

- Jason Helms, “iStr8ne: Electracy in We Are the Strange

- Keith Morton, “The People’s Aesthetic: The Use of 8-bit Graphics and Videogame Culture in M dot Strange’s We Are the Strange

- Joshua Abboud, “Digital Fairy Tales: Narrative Nostalgia and the Violence of Childhood Fantasies in We Are the Strange

Keith took on formal aspects, I looked at the narrative, and Jason took turns discussing portions of our papers that were similar in order to create a more fluid and integrated spoke about it in terms of electracy. We presentation. Clips played on the screen while we spoke and we referred to them when appropriate. For the most part our sections synced up well enough to mimic the integration of all three aspects in the film itself. It was fun to prepare and execute a presentation appropriate for the topic. ~ Josh Abboud

Conference Presentations, CCCC and ATTW

April 12, 2008 by rcid

The RCID Students and Faculty made multiple presentations this April, ‘08, at the College Composition and Communication Conference (CCCC) and the Association of Teachers of Technical Writing Conference (ATTW) in New Orleans. (Top Right: Keith Morton @ the St. Martin, Bedford Publisher’s party, New Orleans Aquarium. Bottom Right: Amanda Booher, Alicia Hatter, and Randy Nichols.)

Dev Bose, “Sophistic Influences on Marxist Rhetorics” (Research Network Forum)

Michelle Dacus Carr, “Rhetorics of the Silhouette in the Work of Kara Walker” (RNF)

Alicia Hatter, Randy Nichols, Wu Dan, and Tharon Howard composed a panel on “Creating A User-Experience Through an ‘Interpellation Research Instrument’ for Giving Websites.”

Cynthia Haynes, “Cities of Rendition: Interrogation on/of the Extrajudicial Edge”

Jason Helms, “Cold Fusion: From Orality to Electracy and Beyond” (RNF)

Jason Helms, “300: From Cool Comic to Cool Film”

Susan Hilligoss, “Multimodal Usability 101″

Josh Hilst, “Inventional Cinematics” (RNF)

Justin Hodgson, “Professional Rhetorics: Rethinking Communication and Composition”

Jan Holmevik, Cynthia Haynes, and Jason Helms, FSIG.22 Serious Games. Jason demonstrated his game based on J. Derrida’s article “Structure, Sign, and Play.”

Tharon Howard, “A Usability Study of Visual and Verbal Approaches to Writing Handbooks”

Tharon Howard, “RIBS: Four Criteria for Meeting the Affective Dimensions of Social Networks”

Steven Katz, “God as Ultimate Sophist: The Tension of Inscription and Absence in the Hebrew Bible”

Steven Katz, “A Meditation on ‘Usability’ “

Xiaoli Li, “New perspectives on intercultural theories and pedagogical methods to connect global and local communities: A scenario-based approach to teaching international/intercultural professional communication” (Won the prize for longest title!)

Keith Morton, “Intercultural New Media and Pedagogy” (RNF)

Barbara Ramirez, “Archives in the Digital Age” (RNF)

Summer Smith Taylor, “Effects of Studio Space on Teaching and Learning of Writing”

Steve Thompson, “Recognizing Rhetoriconics: The Strategic Positing of Rhetorics for Iconic Media” (RNF)

Victor J. Vitanza, “Cities of the Living (’Reversible Destinies’)”

Sean Williams, “The Ethics of Experience Design: Changing the Value
Propositions in Technical Communication”

Art Young, FSIGO9: Meeting of the International Network of Writing-Across-the-Curriculum Programs

~ vjv

PS: RCID Rocks!

A Workshop with Edward Tufte

March 29, 2008 by rcid

“Most design today is impoverished. . . . If your display of information looks like a knockoff or a left over from a PowerPoint pitch, start over.”

tufte21.jpegThese words from Edward Tufte begin to capture the essence of his current seminar series, being offered across the United States. Tufte, a professor emeritus at Yale University, is serving as an ambassador for effective information design, and I was fortunate to attend his seminar, entitled “Presenting Data and Information,” in Atlanta on March 24, 2008.

Tufte addressed his claims about information design using excerpts and examples from his four self-published texts, which were included in thetufte1.jpeg registration for every participant. These texts are packed with images of information design. Often, he would simply reference a page number and allow the participants to simply look at the display. In most cases, the design of these displays made me interested in the content of the display and not its design. This, says Tufte, is the point.

Displays, he says, should escape the flatland of their 2-dimensional territory by providing excellent content. Tufte addressed each of his fundamental principles of analytical design which are also explained in his most recent text, Beautiful Evidence: (1) show comparisons, (2) show causality, (3) show multivariate data; (4) integrate modes of information; (5) document everything and tell people about it; and (6) focus on content.

To address his approach to information design, Tufte brought examples of the earliest information design that escaped flatland: first editions of both Euclid’s (1570) Elements of Geometry and Galileo’s (1613) History and Demonstrations concerning Sunspots and Opinions of Galileo. These two texts were intriguing to see for the sheer experience, but amazing to comprehend the level of information design these two promoted in their own work. Galileo’s study of sunspots interpreted the rotation of the sun to marvelous detail through detailed engravings.

In addition, Tufte addressed interface design using the iPhone, museum wayfinding, and webpage design as examples of using an interface to display content. I enjoyed meeting Professor Tufte and learning directly from one of the current leading scholars in information design. Like his texts, his presentations are full of compelling content, and his personal charisma and humor made this content come alive, in support of his main idea: “If you are presenting and people stop listening to you and start looking at your information, celebrate. You have done it.”

macarthur.jpg

~ Mac McArthur

1st Annual Carolina Rhetoric Conference

February 26, 2008 by rcid

Bringing Clemson & USC together: 1st Annual Carolina Rhetoric Conference: In an attempt to create a space where doctoral students could meet, share work, get feedback, and improve papers and presentations for other conferences (ranging from CCCC to RSA to MLA and so on), the RCID students joined the USC Rhetoric & Composition students for a weekend conference: the 1st annual Carolina Rhetoric Conference (CRC).

The CRC, which was sponsored by the recently founded Rhetoric Society of America chapter at USC, took place on February 22 & 23, 2008. The conference opened on Friday with a brief reception and opening remarks by conference coordinator Paul G. Cook, and then was launched with the first session of the event, “Dynamic Connections: Bodies & Authority.” Two of the three speakers of this first session were RCID students. Amanda K. Booher gave her presentation, ” rcidcrc1.jpeg ‘I’m just Cherry’: The Role of Zombie Amputations and Machine Gun Legs in Reconceptualizing the Body.” Using examples of Oscar Pistorius denial to be allowed to participate in the Olympic games due to his prosthetic blades–making him both “disabled and super-abled”–and the character Cherry Darling, from the Tarantino & Rodriguez film Grindhouse, who “becomes who she was meant to be” once her boyfriend makes her an assault rifle/grenade launcher prosthetic leg, Amanda explored the relationships between bodies, prosthetics, and perception–particularly in relation to how technology (and the merging of human and machine) alters the way we conceive of (receive) bodies.

In the same panel, John Dinolfo delivered a talk titled, “Seeing Cells: Teaching the Visual and Verbal rcidcrc2.jpegRhetoric of Biology.” John’s discussion centered on the collaborative research between himself, Barbara Heifferon (former associate professor at Clemson, now Department Chair of English at the Rochester Institute of Technology), and Lesly Temesvari (Associate Professor of Biology, Clemson University). Their pilot study,* which was published in the Journal of Technical Writing and Communication last fall, explored the rhetorics involved in microscopy instruction and attempted to understand how students came to see, interpret, make sense of, and recognize cellular images (and imagery).

Following the opening session on Friday night, there was a presentation by rcidcrc3.jpegUSC faculty member John Muckelbauer, the Keynote Speaker for the event, and then a “kick-off party” hosted by USC student Eme Crawford. This sharing of “drinks” and “breaking of bread” worked exceptionally well at opening numerous conversations (scholar, professional, personal) and created an opportunity to get to know one another in an informal, yet dynamically engaging environment (much in the spirit of our own Society of the Third Sophistic meetings).

The next day, after a couple of sessions in the morning, many ventured to the Salty Nut (restaurant in 5 points, in Columbia) to “break bread” once again. We rcidcrc4.jpeghad conversations ranging from issues in Basic & Developmental writing, to the experiences of being a doctoral student, to the roles of identity, the problems of definitions, comics, films, food, travel, and so on. It was a delectable lunch with delightful conversation, and helped to further establish the connections and links being formed at the conference. Following lunch, we ventured back to Gambrell Hall for the last 2 sessions of the day: the first, “Composition Pedagogy: Visions & Revisions” featured two RCID students, Justin Hodgson and Sergio Figueiredo, and the second (and last session of the day), “Rhetorical Appropriations of Antiquity,” also featured two RCID students, Dev Bose and Jason Helms.

Justin’s presentation, “Blurring the Boundaries of Writing and Speaking: A Pilot Project,” explored a recent pilot project he put together at Clemson that integrally linksrcidcrc5.jpeg Business Writing and Public Speaking. By having the same students in both his courses, Justin is able to focus on “professional rhetorics” and preparing students for writing, speaking, and multimedia creating for a variety of rhetorical situations. His presentation looked at how rhetorics have become the “handmaiden of writing and speech” in the last century and a half, and how we need to resituate our focus on rhetorics, moving back to its place in the trivium, and attempt to “detonate” the great divide(s) that exist between writing and speaking (and English & Communication Studies)—and his pragmatic application of this is his pilot project.

In his presentation, “Developing a Writing Process Across Media,” Sergio Figueirdo talked about his explorations of the connections between poetry, free writing, andrcidcrc6.jpeg storyboarding. Detailing how he worked with students in Jason Helms writing course, Sergio discussed the process of using storyboards (and image design) as ways for helping students think through and engage ideas. He talked about how some students did literal translations of their poetic interpretations and how others worked more creatively with the material. Acknowledging some resistant areas he encountered, Sergio went on to briefly discuss the relationships he saw between the students reading of poetry and the role/function of storyboarding.

In the last session of the day, Dev Bose led things off with is talk, “Sophistic Influences on Marxist Rhetorics.” Working with three sophists (Protagoras, Democritus, and Gorgias), rcidcrc7.jpegDev attempted to explore the connections between their work and influence of Marxist rhetorics–specifically through a process of connecting them with the works and ideas of a few post-marxists. Dev’s examination traced faint lines between the role of community, the function of the polis, and the implications of logos in relation to these things, as well as the Marxist theories that would (could) evolve from them.

The last RCID student to present was Jason Helms, who delivered his presentation/paper, “300: From Cool Comic to Cool Film.” Jason ventured through the nuances of McLuhan’s distinctions of hot and cool media, and then began to problematize those distinctions as well as explore the relations of them to comics. Specifically, working with Frank Miller’s comic 300, and then looking at Zack Synder’s filmrcidcrc8.jpeg adaptation of that work, Jason discussed the intricacies of moving a cool media into a hot media, but doing so in an attempt to retain its “coolness” (in the McLuhan sense). The presentation also provided an illustration of the connections of Miller’s style (which is/was unique to the comic scene) and Synder’s adaptation, which focused specifically on recreating Miller’s style in a film medium, and how that connection to style played a role in creating this “cool” film.

Following the last session, and some brief closing remarks, the conference came to an end, and the RCID students began the journey back to Clemson University, many reflecting during the drive on how beneficial it was to give their presentations a practice run to a live (and questioning) audience. With the benefits being so self-evident, plans have already begun for the RCIDers to return the favor and host the CRC at Clemson University next year—including extending an invitation to our rhetorical brothers and sisters at N.C. State to join the fun, collegial, positive weekend of scholarship and friendship that is the Carolina Rhetoric Conference.

*Pilot study for Seeing Cells: Teaching the Visual and Verbal Rhetoric of Biology. Technical Writing and Communication, 37.4: 395-417.

hodgsonsm.jpg

~Justin

I on Design or Me in Miami: Conferencing

January 20, 2008 by Steve

The advent of this new year took me to Miami for my first academic conference of the year: The Second International Conference on Design Principles & Practices from January 9-11. This international conference was a cross-disciplinary forum for researchers, teachers, and practitioners interested in and working with the nature of design and its future. Early Friday afternoon, I presented my paper entitled Information Design Finally Defined: The Art, Science, and Technology of Rhetorical Diligence in Media Discourse for Schematic Evidence of Cognitive Structures in Representational Display. Yes, it’s a mouthful, but this paper does successfully address the issues surrounding the multidisciplinary fields and disciplines that seek to take a definitive yet elusive hold on information design today.

The conference consisted of typical plenary sessions and seminars, but it also included talking circles and garden sessions, the latter of which, oddly enough, were not held in a garden. As is customary, I attended the seminars that most interested me. I highlight below why these particular sessions I found to be the most memorable events of this conference.

1. Immersion /Illusion: Space, Place & Complicity at the San Francisco Zoo by Camelia George of the Visual & Critical Studies Department & Design Department, California College of the Arts, California. This was just a fascinating approach to considering the power and decision-making behind the design of zoo facades, the company that creates them, and the venues that immerse visitors into the illusion that they enjoy without consideration of reality or environmental consequence.

2. Ethics of a Designer in a Global Economy: A Class on Contemporary Design Issues by Eric Benson, UCDA, AIGA, CAA, and John Jennings, Graphic Design, Illinois. An STS-related concept but the presenters didn’t seem to think that was its area of importance. Nice quality student work, not much to bring home but the presentation was clear and clean.

3. Creativity in Engineering: Entertainment Engineering & Design by Robert Wysocki of the Art Department and Daniel Cook of the Mechanical Engineering Department, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, Nevada. The University of Nevada now is offering a degree in Entertainment Engineering and these two professors noted the practical issues that surrounded that decision, based largely on the multi-million dollar design sets for Cirque de Soleil and other interactive multimedia performance venues, and including the world-famous fountains at the Bellagio.

4. Hearing Type and Seeing Music: Multisensory Harmonies in Digital Communication by Soo C. Hostetler, Department of Art, University of Northern Iowa, Iowa. I am always intrigued by the poetic use of Macromedia (now Adobe) Flash software and have always been a fan of poemsthatgo.com. This session highlighted some of the instructor’s methodologies for having students work with audio and animated type to produce emotional responses.

5. Building the Maverick Student by Christine Gallagher, Graphic Design, Western Oregon University, Oregon, and Susie Nielsen, MA, USA. This was by far the most powerful session and several people made comment to that effect. These two professors have collaborated with a pedagogical style and exploratory approach to build learning environments that defy the norm. It was evident that all of us assigned the responsibility of helping others learn could improve with techniques learned fom these two women who made such memorable comments indicative of their classroom strategies as they “guide, point, and let the student lead,” they “pull out instead of pour in,” and most importantly, quoting one of their own sources of revelation, that “the thinking comes from the making.” The entire conference trip was truly worth this one presentation and — already a big fan and user of self-directed pedagogies — I have returned and already begun this semester using some of what I took away from this session.

While all of these sessions were uniquely rewarding, and some certainly provided great ideas to consider for my classrooms, the event that most contributed to my area of research in iconics was a garden session and large chunk of time afterwards spent talking with Mario Antonio Minichiello, Head of Department and Chair of Visual Communications at Birmingham City University BIAD in Great Britain. and with Daniel Cook and Robert Wysocki of the University of Nevada. We had a great ‘meeting of the minds’ chat on a patio at the Hyatt. It was evident that the four of us enjoyed our rapport with each other as we addressed contemporary media issues and our perspectives on them. I snapped a few photos as well at that time such as the first one shown above.

South Beach

Of course the trip to Miami was heightened in wonder because of my choice to stay in South Beach and ride the bus into downtown MIami for the conference at the University of MIama Conference Center attached to the Hyatt. I stayed in historic Espanola Way and during my free time enjoyed the incredible South Beach beaches and nightlife. On Thursday night, I brought four of my peers from downtown out to South Beach and we had dinner together, the most amazing tapas, and took in the rest of the sights. The Cuban coffee, the beautiful and sexy models who live and play there, and the gorgeous weather, water, and architecture all contributed to this experience, and I hope more of my colleagues focused on the information design component of our doctoral degree take advantage of the opportunity to present at this conference in the future, though it won’t be in Miami next time, but Berlin. Danke, und Willkommen!

~ Steven John Thompson

pix_thompson.jpg